Author Topic: spalted sycamore bowl  (Read 2311 times)

Offline wider

  • gold
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
spalted sycamore bowl
« on: November 14, 2016, 10:53:12 PM »
this bowl is 12x2 and finished in butchers block oil.

Offline GBF

  • platinum
  • *****
  • Posts: 2262
    • Artistry in wood
Re: spalted sycamore bowl
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2016, 04:47:56 PM »
All this bit of beautiful wood needed was a very simple form.
Looking at the middle pic it is a nice bit of wood spoiled.
Just my opinion

Regards George
The man that never made a mistake never made anything

Offline wider

  • gold
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: spalted sycamore bowl
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2016, 05:00:16 PM »
this bowl was a nice shape and is set of by its beautiful grain. maybe the angle that the photo was taken dos not do it justice.

Offline GBF

  • platinum
  • *****
  • Posts: 2262
    • Artistry in wood
Re: spalted sycamore bowl
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2016, 05:05:37 PM »
Maybe.

Regards George
The man that never made a mistake never made anything

Offline mickdundee

  • iron
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: spalted sycamore bowl
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2016, 08:32:32 PM »
Looks like you've got a very nice finish to bring out the figuring of the timber. I like it

Offline Wood spinner

  • platinum
  • *****
  • Posts: 730
Re: spalted sycamore bowl
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2016, 02:54:54 PM »
I like usable styled bowls , Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

George why is this spoiled ? is it because he did not make it how you would have ?

Offline GBF

  • platinum
  • *****
  • Posts: 2262
    • Artistry in wood
Re: spalted sycamore bowl
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2016, 04:42:15 PM »
As I said just my opinion.
The man that never made a mistake never made anything

Offline Bryan Milham

  • Administrator
  • platinum
  • *****
  • Posts: 4500
  • I’ve had my patience tested; I’m negative
Re: spalted sycamore bowl
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2016, 12:32:06 PM »
Wider,

I think the position of your camera, slightly low, to take the second image has not done the effect of the shape any favours.

I can see you were trying to show the faint spalting in the timber and so got close, but (and I'm guessing) the lenses commonly found on digital SLRs (35mm - 70mm) are not particularly suited to close images. Those found on mobile phones are even worse, set to take fairly broad images with a lot of definition.

You'd be better standing back, taking a high def picture from futher away and then trimming (cropping) it down and resizing it to suit the forum, with software.
Oh Lord, Lead me not into temptation…

...Oh who am I kidding, follow me, I know a shortcut!